<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl" type="text/xsl" media="screen"?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css" type="text/css" media="screen"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" --><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Investing &amp; Finance on Nabloid.com</title>
	<link>http://www.nabloid.com</link>
	<description>Investing &amp; Finance on Nabloid.com</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/CommentsForNabloidOnInvesting" type="application/rss+xml" /><feedburner:browserFriendly></feedburner:browserFriendly><item>
		<title>Comment on I.O.U.S.A. 30 Minute Version! by admin</title>
		<link>http://www.nabloid.com/iousa-30-minute-version/#comment-9929</link>
		<author>admin</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 23:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nabloid.com/iousa-30-minute-version/#comment-9929</guid>
		<description>Please also watch this video: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/03/01/60minutes/main2528226.shtml 

It is about David Walker, comptroller general of the United States.  He totalled up all income and liabilities, and sees some very big problems.

Another good read is Peter Grandich's November 7, 2008 alert here: http://grandich.agoracom.com/2008/11/grandich-letter-alert-november-7-2008-430pm-est/ 

Hope you enjoy them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please also watch this video: <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/03/01/60minutes/main2528226.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/03/01/60minutes/main2528226.shtml</a> </p>
<p>It is about David Walker, comptroller general of the United States.  He totalled up all income and liabilities, and sees some very big problems.</p>
<p>Another good read is Peter Grandich&#8217;s November 7, 2008 alert here: <a href="http://grandich.agoracom.com/2008/11/grandich-letter-alert-november-7-2008-430pm-est/" rel="nofollow">http://grandich.agoracom.com/2008/11/grandich-letter-alert-november-7-2008-430pm-est/</a> </p>
<p>Hope you enjoy them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Obama: Beyond the Hype by Nabloid’s Economic Policies: Good Economic Policies Result in a Healthy Environment for Investing » Investing &amp; Finance on Nabloid.com</title>
		<link>http://www.nabloid.com/obama-beyond-the-hype/#comment-9928</link>
		<author>Nabloid’s Economic Policies: Good Economic Policies Result in a Healthy Environment for Investing » Investing &amp; Finance on Nabloid.com</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 22:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nabloid.com/obama-beyond-the-hype/#comment-9928</guid>
		<description>[...] all the talk about Obama, I thought I’d switch a bit and focus on what I’d do. This is a simple list of economic [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] all the talk about Obama, I thought I&#8217;d switch a bit and focus on what I&#8217;d do. This is a simple list of economic [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Obama: Beyond the Hype by admin</title>
		<link>http://www.nabloid.com/obama-beyond-the-hype/#comment-9927</link>
		<author>admin</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 22:44:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nabloid.com/obama-beyond-the-hype/#comment-9927</guid>
		<description>I must add one something: Obama has two wild cards that could present themselves during his terms.  SPACE and ALTERNATIVE ENERGY.   If he can focus on encouraging the economy to go in this direction, things might just work out really well!

I think we are headed toward space and alternative energy anyways, but a President can speed it up or slow it down.  I hope he doesn't unintentionally slow it down with dumb economic policies that hinder the economy.  Time will tell.  Ultimately, these will occur, with or without President Obama's support.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must add one something: Obama has two wild cards that could present themselves during his terms.  SPACE and ALTERNATIVE ENERGY.   If he can focus on encouraging the economy to go in this direction, things might just work out really well!</p>
<p>I think we are headed toward space and alternative energy anyways, but a President can speed it up or slow it down.  I hope he doesn&#8217;t unintentionally slow it down with dumb economic policies that hinder the economy.  Time will tell.  Ultimately, these will occur, with or without President Obama&#8217;s support.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Obama: Beyond the Hype by admin</title>
		<link>http://www.nabloid.com/obama-beyond-the-hype/#comment-9876</link>
		<author>admin</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 21:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nabloid.com/obama-beyond-the-hype/#comment-9876</guid>
		<description>I seen a comment by someone named, Mr. B. on seeking alpha and I just HAD to quote it. 

"I have a libertarian philosophy in the spirit of Jefferson and Hamilton. Change would mean refocusing on the Constitution and Bill of Rights, focusing on personal freedom and personal responsibiltity, and focusing on reducing the size of government as a percent of GDP by eliminating useless programs, wasteful spending and all kinds of transfer payments.

Individualism, economic freedom and entrepreneurship made America great. Big government, entitlement and the general ignorance of American history and constitutional government have made America soft.

As people begin to focus on Obama from a policy perspective, which by the way should have been done during the primaries and Presidential campaign, there will likely be many questions - in part because Obama was so vague and often offered conflicting statements. The only point of consistency was his plan to raise taxes and his view that government should be at the center of all things economic.

If he has his way, I expect the Mr. Market to catch a considerable cold.

I do not see Obama as thoughtful at all. I see him as ideological with very liberal tax and spend agenda. For example, he wants to raise taxes on capital because of his arbitrary sense of fairness even though he acknowledged that the empirical evidence did not support his view.

Let's hope he has no honeymoon given that he has had a free pass in the press for the last two years. Just maybe then, Obama will not wreck what is left of the economy.

Let's hope he is pragmatic. I am not holding my breath."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I seen a comment by someone named, Mr. B. on seeking alpha and I just HAD to quote it. </p>
<p>&#8220;I have a libertarian philosophy in the spirit of Jefferson and Hamilton. Change would mean refocusing on the Constitution and Bill of Rights, focusing on personal freedom and personal responsibiltity, and focusing on reducing the size of government as a percent of GDP by eliminating useless programs, wasteful spending and all kinds of transfer payments.</p>
<p>Individualism, economic freedom and entrepreneurship made America great. Big government, entitlement and the general ignorance of American history and constitutional government have made America soft.</p>
<p>As people begin to focus on Obama from a policy perspective, which by the way should have been done during the primaries and Presidential campaign, there will likely be many questions - in part because Obama was so vague and often offered conflicting statements. The only point of consistency was his plan to raise taxes and his view that government should be at the center of all things economic.</p>
<p>If he has his way, I expect the Mr. Market to catch a considerable cold.</p>
<p>I do not see Obama as thoughtful at all. I see him as ideological with very liberal tax and spend agenda. For example, he wants to raise taxes on capital because of his arbitrary sense of fairness even though he acknowledged that the empirical evidence did not support his view.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s hope he has no honeymoon given that he has had a free pass in the press for the last two years. Just maybe then, Obama will not wreck what is left of the economy.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s hope he is pragmatic. I am not holding my breath.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Congratulations America by Obama: Beyond the Hype » Investing &amp; Finance on Nabloid.com</title>
		<link>http://www.nabloid.com/congratulations-america/#comment-9875</link>
		<author>Obama: Beyond the Hype » Investing &amp; Finance on Nabloid.com</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 19:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nabloid.com/congratulations-america/#comment-9875</guid>
		<description>[...] you already know, Obama is the next President of the United States. I hope to take a look at what I believe will happen and how it will affect the economy and our [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] you already know, Obama is the next President of the United States. I hope to take a look at what I believe will happen and how it will affect the economy and our [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Obama Economics: The Future of Investments &amp; the Economy Under President Obama by Congratulations America » Investing &amp; Finance on Nabloid.com</title>
		<link>http://www.nabloid.com/obama-economics-the-future-of-investments-the-economy-under-president-obama/#comment-9854</link>
		<author>Congratulations America » Investing &amp; Finance on Nabloid.com</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 02:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nabloid.com/obama-economics-the-future-of-investments-the-economy-under-president-obama/#comment-9854</guid>
		<description>[...] the second I saw him! I’m not lying or joking. I knew it. That’s why I’ve been critical of Obama and barely said anything about McCain, who I was also not a big fan of either. To me, I seen a man [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] the second I saw him! I&#8217;m not lying or joking. I knew it. That&#8217;s why I&#8217;ve been critical of Obama and barely said anything about McCain, who I was also not a big fan of either. To me, I seen a man [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Obama Economics: The Future of Investments &amp; the Economy Under President Obama by admin</title>
		<link>http://www.nabloid.com/obama-economics-the-future-of-investments-the-economy-under-president-obama/#comment-9723</link>
		<author>admin</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 21:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nabloid.com/obama-economics-the-future-of-investments-the-economy-under-president-obama/#comment-9723</guid>
		<description>While I don't advocate tax increases, I do advocate government spending decreases in order to balance the budget!  We must balance the budget and work on balancing the trade deficit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I don&#8217;t advocate tax increases, I do advocate government spending decreases in order to balance the budget!  We must balance the budget and work on balancing the trade deficit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fiat Currency: A Potentially Fatal Flaw? by I.O.U.S.A. 30 Minute Version! » Investing &amp; Finance on Nabloid.com</title>
		<link>http://www.nabloid.com/fiat-currency-a-potentially-fatal-flaw/#comment-9721</link>
		<author>I.O.U.S.A. 30 Minute Version! » Investing &amp; Finance on Nabloid.com</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 20:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nabloid.com/fiat-currency-a-potentially-fatal-flaw/#comment-9721</guid>
		<description>[...] Fiat Currency: A Potentially Fatal Flaw? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Fiat Currency: A Potentially Fatal Flaw? [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Democrats are Socialists and the Republicans are Liberals! by admin</title>
		<link>http://www.nabloid.com/the-democrats-are-socialists-and-the-republicans-are-liberals/#comment-9704</link>
		<author>admin</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 21:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nabloid.com/the-democrats-are-socialists-and-the-republicans-are-liberals/#comment-9704</guid>
		<description>Also, think about Obama's planned taxes at rates above 50% in some cases!  Doctors will surely feel it big.  They will spend their 12 to 16 hour days treating patients that often pay no taxes, meanwhile only being able to keep under half of what they earned from their hard work.  

Innovation in the medical sector will still be there because many of the hospitals, even poorly run socialized ones, will want new technologies to help treat the patients more effectively.  The U.S. will still innovate in this sector.  There may not be as many smaller companies innovating though, due to the large state run hospitals only purchasing technologies from larger, more established companies with strong track records and balance sheets - and manufacturing facilities large enough to provide a large number of medical units in a timely fashion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, think about Obama&#8217;s planned taxes at rates above 50% in some cases!  Doctors will surely feel it big.  They will spend their 12 to 16 hour days treating patients that often pay no taxes, meanwhile only being able to keep under half of what they earned from their hard work.  </p>
<p>Innovation in the medical sector will still be there because many of the hospitals, even poorly run socialized ones, will want new technologies to help treat the patients more effectively.  The U.S. will still innovate in this sector.  There may not be as many smaller companies innovating though, due to the large state run hospitals only purchasing technologies from larger, more established companies with strong track records and balance sheets - and manufacturing facilities large enough to provide a large number of medical units in a timely fashion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Democrats are Socialists and the Republicans are Liberals! by GeminiAtlas</title>
		<link>http://www.nabloid.com/the-democrats-are-socialists-and-the-republicans-are-liberals/#comment-9691</link>
		<author>GeminiAtlas</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 19:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nabloid.com/the-democrats-are-socialists-and-the-republicans-are-liberals/#comment-9691</guid>
		<description>Hi, nice post.  Hit the nail on the head with that one.  Also on the healthcare thing, which country is currently a major engine of innovation in that sector?  The USA, of course.  If the US goes the way of most other advanced countries by socializing medicine, who will be left to invent all the new medicines, surgeries, diagnostic tools (where did they get those MRI machines from in you Canadian hospital?  hmm?)?
Don't get me wrong, I'm sure that new medical advances will be made, but many less and to cure less people.  Also, where will all the med students go?  There would be less and less students who would want to go into healthcare professions because what they would get paid in the "universal Healthcare System" would make it not worthwhile to go through all that schooling.  Better off going into other more lucrative fields.  This will all spell out the nightmare scenario so illustratively described above by the author.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, nice post.  Hit the nail on the head with that one.  Also on the healthcare thing, which country is currently a major engine of innovation in that sector?  The USA, of course.  If the US goes the way of most other advanced countries by socializing medicine, who will be left to invent all the new medicines, surgeries, diagnostic tools (where did they get those MRI machines from in you Canadian hospital?  hmm?)?<br />
Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I&#8217;m sure that new medical advances will be made, but many less and to cure less people.  Also, where will all the med students go?  There would be less and less students who would want to go into healthcare professions because what they would get paid in the &#8220;universal Healthcare System&#8221; would make it not worthwhile to go through all that schooling.  Better off going into other more lucrative fields.  This will all spell out the nightmare scenario so illustratively described above by the author.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
